You are here

Opinions

The District of XXXXX offers a database of opinions for the years 19XX to 2011, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.

Huntington learned of the Teleservices transfers because Cyberco maintained its bank accounts at Huntington. Laws 566.38(2)(b); and (3) Cyberco did not give value for any of these transfers, as Huntington agrees that none of the transfers were on account of a debt Teleservices owed to Cyberco. Although Section 550(b)(1) controls whether Huntington has a defense to the transfers Teleservices was depositing into Cyberco s Huntington accounts, Section 548(c) controlled the already decided ...

Trustee S Argument Stern v. Marshall5 is the Supreme Court s most recent decision regarding a bankruptcy judge s authority. In effect, the Court was confronted with two possibilities either the bankruptcy court had the constitutional authority to enter the judgment against Pierce or it did not. 32 Indeed, it is the Court s refusal in both Stern and Northern Pipeline to allow a bankruptcy court to do everything that Congress might like that stands as a clear indication that the Court will...

14 Cpt Holdings As already indicated, the issue Trustee raises is whether the withdrawal liability associated with a debtor s participation in a multiemployer plan should be included in deciding whether a constructively fraudulent transfer has been made. Rather, it addressed the much different question of whether a debtor s withdrawal liability was discharged as part of a confirmed Chapter 11 plan even though the debtor s actual withdrawal from the plan had not occurred until later. ...

After some discovery, U.S. Bank and the trustee entered into a settlement pursuant to which the trustee dismissed the estate s lawsuit with prejudice and abandoned the estate s interest in the three parcels to the Debtor. Within the year following the dismissal, U.S Bank took steps to foreclose the Debtor s interest in Parcels A, B and C, which prompted the Debtor to file suit in Kent County Circuit Court (the State Court ), challenging the mortgage on the same grounds the trustee ...

Pages